|
Force Paradigm Seminar Training Connecticut Pistol Permit Class 13thjuror Use of Force Training Seminars Certified Connecticut POSTC Law Enforcement Instructor 13th Juror, LLC |
|
|
Police Procedures & Practices Liability ExpertCan a cop really do that?
Expert Witness & Police TrainerBusiness Description - Police Procedures & Practices Expert Witness
Less Lethal Force and Lethal Use of Force; Domestic Violence Arrest protocols. State Court and Federal Court qualified expert on the standard of duty of care necessary for the use of justified and necessary constitutional counter force. Use of Force Policy Design for Deadly Force Shooting Decisions, Search & Seizure Arrest Protocols, Lethal & Less-Lethal Defensive Tactics, Baton Use, Taser(ECD) Protocols, OC AerosolTactical Use, Police Pursuits, safe prisoner custody, restraint ,and transport, and Jail Suicide prevention. Auditing of Law Enforcement Agency Policies & Practices for " Best Practices" litigation inoculation. Before a police officer performs a lawful seizure, he/she must know and rely upon the law. Each Liability law disc contains the full case review of more then 5,400 Police Procedures and Practices cases (Updated to April 7, 2013) from the United States Federal & State Court Systems. The United States Supreme Court, Federal Courts, and State Courts are represented. Link to "Coplaw CD" in the left column to purchase your disc. (13thjuror Brochure) In determining whether expert testimony on the use of force by a police officer is properly admissible under the appropriate standard, we note that "[a]s a general proposition, the 'objective reasonableness' standard may be comprehensible to a lay juror. On the other hand, any 'objective' test implies the existence of a standard of conduct, and, where the standard is not defined by the generic--a reasonable person--but rather by the specific--a reasonable officer--it is more likely that [federal rule of evidence] 702's line between common and specialized knowledge has been crossed."Kopf v. Skyrm, 993 F.2d 374, 378 (4th Cir. 1993) (analyzing plaintiff's claim that court improperly excluded expert testimony concerning defendant's use of non-deadlyforce in effecting arrest). In Kopf, the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit stated that "[w]here force is reduced to its most primitive form--the bare hands--expert testimony might not be helpful. Add handcuffs, a gun, a slapjack, [M]ace, or some other tool, and the jury may start to ask itself: What is [M]ace? What is an officer's training on using a gun? How much damage can a slapjack do? Answering these questions may often be assisted by expert testimony." State v. Smith, 73 Conn.App. 173, 807 A.2d 500 (Conn.App. 10/22/2002)...We conclude that the test for evaluating self-defense claims pursuant to Connecticut General Statute 53a-22 is a subjective-objective test. In determining whether an officer has a reasonable suspicion of a threat to his/her personal safety the courts have considered the training and experience of the officer. See United States v. Arvizu, 534 U.S. 266, 273, 122 S.Ct. 744 (2002) ("This process allows officers to draw on their own experience and specialized training to make inferences from and deductions about the cumulative information available to them that might well elude an untrained person.");United States v. Barlin, 686 F.2d 81, 86 (2nd Cir. 1982) ("[W]e must view the surrounding circumstances . . . through the eyes of a reasonable and cautious police officer on the scene guided by his training and experience."); United States v. Rideau, 969 F.2d 1572, 1575 (5th Cir. 1992) ("Trained, experienced officers....may perceive danger where an untrained observer would not.").
34 years of Police Experience. Connecticut Police Academy Training Instructor (Ret) Connecticut Police Academy Worker's Compensation Stipulation
Reginald F.
, Jr.
13thJuror, LLC
P.O. Box 1013
Southington, Connecticut 06489-5013
Voice: (860)-621-1013 ( Police Assistance - Code 1013 )
Fax: (860)-621-1013 DISCLAIMER: This website nor its' links are intended to be legal
advice, and the information contain therein should not be construed to be legal advice. Any specific fact patterns as they relate to
State laws or Federal laws and/or Regulations should be directed to an appropriate attorney for
legal clarification and opinion. The information contained within is not intended as the giving or tendering to another person for
consideration, direct or indirect, of any advice or counsel pertaining to a law
question or a court action or judicial proceeding brought or about to be
brought; or the undertaking or acting as a representative or on behalf of
another person to commence, settle, compromise, adjust, or dispose of any civil
or criminal case or cause of action.
|
|
|